This Date in Poker: Chris Moneymaker Wins WSOP Main Event (2003)

Chris MoneymakerMany in the poker world are noting today how it was 10 years ago — May 23, 2003 — that the final day of the remarkable 2003 World Series of Poker Main Event took place and Chris Moneymaker completed his improbable run to the bracelet and $2.5 million prize.

The day culminated the five-day tournament that saw a then-record 839 players enter the $10,000 buy-in event. Moneymaker was among of the first wave of players ever to qualify for the WSOP Main Event via an online satellite, in his case representing one of 37 players who won seats and travel packages to Binion’s Horseshoe in Las Vegas that year via PokerStars.

Following several years’ worth of losing at sports betting and other gambling games, the 27-year-old accountant began playing poker both live and online, and in April 2003 entered an 18-player, $39 buy-in sit-n-go tournament on PokerStars apparently without realizing it was not a cash tournament but a satellite with the winner earning a spot in another WSOP Main Event satellite.

After winning the sit-n-go, Moneymaker found himself in the second satellite in which the top three finishers were awarded the $10,000 Main Event entry plus another $1,000 in expenses, with the fourth-place finisher earning $8,000 cash. Moneymaker has explained on several occasions, including most recently in the 2012 documentary All In: The Poker Movie, how after making the final table of the second satellite he began purposely trying to lose chips in an attempt to finish fourth, as the cash prize was much more attractive to him than was the entry to the WSOP Main Event.

Convinced by a friend to go for the ME seat who further promised to buy half of his action should he play, Moneymaker finished in the top three only later to discover his friend was unable to fulfill his promise to give him the $5,000. Ultimately Moneymaker would sell 20% of his action to another friend who like Moneymaker had a weirdly appropriate last name — David Gamble — and thus just a few weeks later made the trip to Las Vegas to play in the Main Event.

Having had only limited live game experience — and, in fact, never having played a live tournament before — Moneymaker traveled to Las Vegas a week ahead of time to play cash games and satellites.

The Main Event began on Monday, May 19, with players starting with 10,000 chips. According to PokerPages’ reporting on the 2003 WSOP Main Event, a total of 385 players survived the first day of play, with Barry Greenstein the end-of-Day-1 chip leader (with 94,775), and the top 10 including Sam Farha (3rd), Tomer Benevenisti (4th), Phil Ivey (6th), and Freddy Deeb (8th). Meanwhile, Moneymaker had managed to accumulate a stack of 60,475 that first day to sit in 11th position.

Day 2 then saw the field trimmed to 111 players, with Amir Vahedi ending the day atop the counts with 303,400, with Bryan Watkins, Scotty Nguyen, Howard Lederer, Freddy Deeb, Phil Ivey, Marcel Luske, Humberto Brenes, James Meehan, and Dutch Boyd rounding out the top 10. Moneymaker ended the day on Tuesday, May 20 in 26th position with a stack of 100,900, still above the average (then a little over 75,000).

On Day 3 the cash bubble burst (at 63 players), with David Chiu (55th, $15,000), Barry Greenstein (49th, $20,000), and Annie Duke (47th, $20,000) among those cashing that day. A total of 45 players survived Day 3, led by Bruno Fitoussi with 671,500 followed by Dutch Boyd (2nd), Scotty Nguyen (3rd), and Phil Hellmuth (4th). Moneymaker ended Day 3 with a stack of 357,000, good enough for 6th among the remaining 45.

The long Day 4 saw them play from 45 players all of the way down to nine. By the dinner break just 22 were left, with Humberto Brenes (41st, $25,000), Jeff Shulman (31st, $35,000), Phil Hellmuth (27th, $45,000), and Men Nguyen (25th, $45,000) among the eliminated. Dutch Boyd had the chip lead then, with Moneymaker still in sixth.

By night’s end they’d reached the final table, the final hand of the night involving Moneymaker dramatically eliminating Phil Ivey in 10th place ($82,700) in a hand that saw Moneymaker flop trip queens (with A-Q), Ivey turn a full house (with 9-9) and get all of his chips in the middle, then Moneymaker spike a four-outer when an ace fell on the river. Others cashing after dinner and prior to Ivey’s exit on Day 4 included Howard Lederer (19th, $45,000), Bruno Fitoussi (15th, $65,000), Marcel Luske ($65,000), Freddy Deeb (13th, $65,000), Dutch Boyd (12th, $80,000), and Minh Nguyen (11th, $80,000).

That hand versus Ivey gave Moneymaker a stack of 2.344 million and the chip lead to start Friday’s final table, with Amir Vahedi the only other player with more than a million (1.407 million) and Sammy Farha next closest with 990,000. Play began in the afternoon, with Moneymaker maintaining the lead as David Singer (9th, $120,000), David Grey (8th, $160,000), and Young Pak (7th, $200,000) were eliminated.

Meanwhile Farha was chipping up, having earned a lot of chips at Amir Vahedi’s expense who subsequently went out in 6th ($250,000). Tomer Benevenisti (5th, $320,000) and Jason Lester (4th, $440,000) followed Vahedi railward, and as they neared 11 p.m. three-handed play began.

Farha and Moneymaker were virtually even to start three-handed play (both at around 3.7 million chips), while Dan Harrington was well behind with just under 1 million. The three would play for two hours more before Moneymaker eliminated Harrington to set up heads-up play with Moneymaker enjoying about a 2-to-1 chip advantage over Farha.

As both Moneymaker and Farha explain in Grantland’s recent oral history of the 2003 WSOP Main Event, the pair discussed the possibility of a deal to divide the remaining prize money, with Moneymaker offering an even split despite having a chip advantage. Farha responded by saying he wanted more than half of the remaining money, and when Moneymaker declined no deal was made.

Heads-up play lasted 28 hands, a little over half an hour not counting the break to discuss a possible chop. The most dramatic hand involved an all-in river shove by Moneymaker with king-high and no pair on a board with three spades, a bluff that successfully forced Farha to fold his top pair of nines.

It was after 1:30 a.m. Vegas time — technically May 24th — when the final hand was dealt, one that saw Farha flop top pair of jacks, Moneymaker flop bottom two pair (fives and fours), and Moneymaker ultimately improving to a full house to win.

By most accounts about 300 witnessed the final table play out that night at Binion’s, and there was immediate evidence that Moneymaker’s victory might earn special notice as the David-versus-Goliath story of the amateur’s victory made national news during subsequent days.

A guest appearance by Moneymaker on “The Late Show With David Letterman” would come in June, but it really wasn’t until ESPN began airing on its coverage of the WSOP Main Event in seven weekly one-hour installments starting on August 26th that the full impact of Moneymaker’s win began to be felt, with the combined influence of online poker, poker on television (with hole cards), and the compelling story of an uncannily-named amateur player’s triumph inspiring countless others to get involved in the game.

Posted in NEWS | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

More Run-Bad for WSOP Main Event Winners; Jamie Gold Bracelet for Auction

wsop-06-braceletThe recent stretch of run-bad for prior winners of the World Series of Poker main event continued recently with the revelation that 2006 champion Jamie Gold’s downturn has resulted in the upcoming auction of his WSOP champion’s bracelet, along with the auction of a Corum watch that Gold received in the same Series for being the chip leader at the final table.

The twin auctions, offered as part of a two-day sports collectibles show run by auction giant Muvico, will be knocked down in early August to the highest bidders.  Gold’s $12 million victory back in 2006 was the largest until Antonio Esfandiari’s $18.3 million prize in the OneDrop tourney, but when you consider that Gold’s career winnings since then are $136,196 in nearly seven years, he’s one of poker’s ultimate one-hit wonders.

Some of the promotional material seems to claim that Gold’s bracelet is the first WSOP main event bracelet up for auction, but that’s not even close to being true; Gold’s bracelet isn’t even the first one offered this year.  Jerry Yang’s 2007 bracelet was seized and auctioned by the IRS in April to help satisfy a $570,000 tax lien, and Brad Daugherty’s 1991 bracelet was offered on eBay in 2010, but bidding didn’t reach the reserve price.

That any of these bracelets would sell for much more than their melt and gem value remains something of a mystery; the Yang bracelet, for example, had a minimum bid just north of $6,000.

jamie-gold-watchGold’s bracelet, per the description, includes 120 grams of white and yellow gold, at 14K, roughly 60%.  That puts the melt value of the gold alone at $3,000 or so, meaning that with all the little diamonds, this might be another $5,000 or $6,000 bracelet.  And the watch (shown at right) — well, that ought to fetch another $1.49 or so.

But Gold’s financial struggles are more the story here, beginning with him being forced to surrender several millions from his initial $12 million prize to Crispin Leyser, with whom he’d agreed to split the original winnings.  Then came a failed reality-TV concept and the dismal non-performance of Gold’s “BuzzNation concept agency, and Gold’s own oh-fer-two showing with endorsement deals with online poker rooms (Bodog and Aced).

Toss in the extremely short-lived Jamie Gold Poker Room at the Tropicana, and it was actually oh-fer-three.  A Midas touch, this Gold hasn’t had.

The overlying theme, though, is that this is not at all unusual for WSOP main event winners.  Yang, the anonymous former refugee who won just a year after Gold, seems to have spent most of his money on charity and on a Sacramento-area business venture while neglecting to pay taxes on his big win which is why the IRS auction above happened.

Yet a quick look at the main event champion’s list shows that Gold and Yang aren’t the only recent winners to find trouble.  Greg Raymer was the victim of an attempted robbery at the Bellagio before getting himself into trouble in a North Carolina prostitution sting earlier this year, and Canadian Jonathan Duhamel went home to find a former girlfriend setting him up for a home-invasion robbery, with his bracelet coming out of it even worse for wear than Duhamel.

Then there’s the 1994 WSOP winner, some guy named Russell Hamilton.  And his long time assistant / partner in UltimateBet crime, 1990 winner Mansour Matloubi.

Stuey Ungar, Hal Fowler, Chris Ferguson… the list goes on.  It’s amazing to see just how many of the main event winners have gone on to have major life difficulties, whether or not they’ve enjoyed continued success at the table.  Just as winning the lottery is often seen as a mixed blessing, the same thing might just hold true for the WSOP main event.

Posted in Op-ed | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

2013 WSOPE Schedule Aims to Please All Comers

WSOP EuropePlayers are counting down the days until the start of next week’s 44th annual World Series of Poker in Las Vegas. Officials at Caesars Entertainment, owners of the WSOP brand, have been doing their best to stoke the excitement with a steady stream of announcements over the past week.

Yesterday Caesars PR man Seth Palansky unveiled the schedule for this year’s 7th annual World Series of Poker Europe. Seven bracelet events will take place at the Casino Barrière d’Enghien-les-Bains near Paris, France from October 12 through October 25, immediately after the end of EPT London. The schedule features the first-ever mixed-max Pot Limit Omaha event, and the WSOP’s inaugural High Rollers event, a €25,000 affair intended to convince players to stick around a little longer if they bust out of the €10,000 Main Event.

The WSOPE has bounced around the last few years as Caesars has struggled to grow the event. Caesars held the WSOPE in London for its first four years, during which time the £10,000 Main Event averaged a steady 350 players each year.

In 2011 the WSOPE moved to Cannes and Caesars dropped the buy-in of the Main Event to €10,000. Main Event attendance increased to 593 players that year, but last year only 420 players participated, a year-on-year drop of nearly 30%. The precipitous decline in attendance stood in stark contrast to the WSOP Main Event in Las Vegas, which saw only a modest 4% fall-off from 2011 to 2012.

This year Caesars seems to be simultaneously trying to please as many different types of players as it can. Tournament officials have made the series easier to get to and have included seven different buy-ins, ranging from €1,000 to €25,000, across the seven events of the series. Four dozen smaller side events will also be held.

WSOP Executive Director Ty Stewart acknowledged in the press release accompanying the schedule that the move to Paris and the WSOPE Main Event’s new spot on the calendar – a move largely dictated by the timing of EPT London – is intended to encourage greater participation in the series.

“New tournament dates and 12 million Parisians have us aiming for the largest Main Event in Europe,” he said.

The 2013 WSOPE schedule is set out below:

Event 1: Saturday, October 12, 2013 – €1,100 No-Limit Hold’em Re-Entry (two starting days)
Event 2: Monday, October 14, 2013 – €5,300 Mixed-Max No-Limit Hold’em
Event 3: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 – €1,650 Pot Limit Omaha
Event 4: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 – €2,200 No-Limit Hold’em
Event 5: Thursday, October 17, 2013 – €3,250 Mixed-Max No-Limit Hold’em
Event 6: Saturday, October 19, 2013 – €10,450 No-Limit Hold’em Main Event (two starting days)
Event 7: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 – €25,600 High Roller No-Limit Hold’em

Posted in NEWS | Leave a comment

Will the Atlantic Club Seek a New Buyer?

Atlantic Club

The Atlantic Club will remain in Colony Capital’s hands — for now.

On Friday a New Jersey judge dissolved a temporary restraining order obtained by Rational Group two weeks ago against the owners of the Atlantic Club Casino. The TRO prevented the owners, Colony Capital LLC, from shopping the casino around to new buyers while Rational Group attempted to litigate Colony’s April termination of Rational’s deal to acquire the property.

With the TRO no longer in place, Colony is free to sell the Atlantic Club to other potential buyers while Rational theoretically continues to litigate its dispute with Colony. In practice, however, Rational is not likely to continue the litigation, as Judge Raymond Batten’s ruling on the TRO considerably dampens Rational’s likelihood of success in the case. And even if Rational were to succeed, Colony is likely to sell the Atlantic Club long before the case comes to a conclusion.

The big question now is three-fold: (a) is there really any other buyer interested in the property; (b) will Colony re-commence negotiations with Rational at a significantly higher valuation; and (c) is there any chance that Colony will retain the property now that New Jersey has enacted online gaming legislation?

Idle speculation suggests that Station Casinos could be a good fit for the Atlantic Club, due to its prior business relationships with Colony. To date there has been no public announcement of either an acqusition of the Atlantic Club by, or a Colony partnership with, Station. Atlantic Club COO Michael Frawley said Friday after the ruling, “We are now free to build on the tremendous opportunity provided by online gaming,” suggesting that Colony terminated the deal to make a go at online gaming themselves.

That’s hard to imagine, given the Atlantic Club’s track record in the face of the obstacles of the last five years. The casino has operated in the red since 2007, losing more than $100 million in that span. Its loss from operations was $26.8 million in 2012 alone.

The Atlantic Club also has unfunded pension obligations of $32 million and faces stiff competition not only from the other 11 Atlantic City casinos but also casinos that have sprouted in eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware over the last six years. The first Maryland casinos are scheduled to open later this year, potentially further eroding the Atlantic Club’s player base.

Frawley and other casino executives also had to know, at the time the acquisition agreement with Rational was signed in December, that there was at least an even chance that online gaming would be legalized in New Jersey. The State Senate had overwhelmingly passed an online gaming legalization bill just four days before the deal was inked. The bill was then sent to Gov. Chris Christie for his consideration.

While Rational obviously would have less or no interest in the Atlantic Club if Christie vetoed the measure, the potential upside of legalization surely outweighed the potential downside of passing on Rational’s $15 million offer and getting stuck holding the bag if legalization failed, which ultimately would have meant putting the property into bankruptcy. Why not wait?

The answer seems likely to be that Atlantic Club officials realized back in December that even with legalized intrastate online gaming, there’s no place for the Atlantic Club in the online gaming market without a significant online gaming partner like Rational. The casino has no online gaming software and no built-in employee knowledgebase regarding online gaming, putting it at a competitive disadvantage to casino groups like MGM and Caesars. Those operators have an additional leg-up on Atlantic Club by virtue of their deep pockets.

The reality is that a casino as small as Atlantic Club will have a difficult time leveraging the promise and potential of online gaming fast enough to turn its fortunes around without requiring a massive capital injection. After spending $100 million keeping the Atlantic Club in business the last five years, Colony can be excused if it’s a little gun-shy about more spending now.

It’s much easier to imagine a buyer like Rational using its own existing brand, market share and combined live-and-online gaming expertise to make the Atlantic Club profitable. That’s why so many industry observers believe that there’s another potential bidder waiting in the wings who is willing to pay significantly more than $15 million for the property now that New Jersey has legalized full-fledged online gaming. Whether that bidder is Rational, Station or some other industry operator remains to be seen.

Rational obtained the TRO two weeks ago after Colony exercised a termination provision in the acquisition agreement for the casino. Court filings revealed that Rational agreed to pay $15 million for the Atlantic Club, the lowest price ever paid for an Atlantic City casino, and had already injected $11 million into the ailing casino in the months since the deal was signed.

The dispute that led to the lawsuit and the TRO hinged on the construction of a provision in the acquisition agreement that allowed either side to terminate the deal if Rational hadn’t received preliminary licensing approval from New Jersey regulators by April 26. When that date passed and Rational was still months away from a final determination on its license application, Colony terminated the deal.

Posted in LEGAL NEWS, NEWS | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Annie Duke & Phil Hellmuth Statements: Technically True, Intellectually Dishonest

You lie down with dogs, you get Rivers-ed.

You lie down with dogs, you get Rivers-ed.

Former UB spokesplayers Phil Hellmuth and Annie Duke wasted little time last week in issuing public statements attempting to distance themselves from the conspiracy recently made public in connection to the long-term cheating of players at UltimateBet, which occurred from 2003-07.

Those statements by Hellmuth and Duke are reproduced at the bottom of this post, in their entirety.

The cheating and subsequent attempted cover-up, orchestrated by primary cheat Russ Hamilton and including, at a minimum, UB founder and CEO Greg Pierson and corporate attorneys Daniel Friedberg and Sanford Millar, remains one of the blackest episodes in online poker history.  Hamilton secretly recorded at least two lengthy meetings himself, with the tapes released recently by Travis Makar, Hamilton’s private security expert.

Arguing that the sins of Hellmuth and Duke are on the same level as those of Hamilton, Pierson, Friedberg and the other cheats is silly — you won’t find that statement here.  Russ Hamilton, Greg Pierson, Daniel Pierson and at least four others rank at 10 out of 10 on the corruption scale.  Those people need to be in jail and have their assets and personal wealth stripped from them… and you’ll notice that none of these people are out there protesting their innocence.

Meanwhile, Hellmuth and Duke — neither of whom participated in the actual cheating — are out there trying to spin themselves away from the criminal activity and its stink.  They’d like their followers to believe that their involvement should be a 0 out of 10 on the old corruption scale.

However, it’s not that simple.

It’s bad enough that the Hellmuth and Duke, via their celebrity, played a direct role in convincing tens of thousand of players to deposit money at UltimateBet.  And maybe the $23 million in cheating officially acknowledged by UltimateBet is all there was, though convincing evidence exists that the real amount cheated was significantly higher.

What that doesn’t even begin to address is the $55 million or thereabouts that remains owed to customers of UB who were left adrift after the site folded following the Black Friday indictments.  Those players didn’t sign up because Tiffany Michele wore UB gear; they deposited because of Hellmuth and Duke, above all others.

Even if that was all there was to it, the statements by Hellmuth and Duke ignore that responsibility.

The truth, however, is much, much worse.  Hellmuth and Duke weren’t just site reps, they were owners.  Hellmuth was one of Ultimatebet’s founding investors and Duke arrived on the scene soon after, taking such an ingrained role with the site that she moved to Portland, Oregon for two years to work with programmers on developing the site’s appearance and feel.

Both of them made millions from their ownership of UltimateBet, and continue to receive similar benefits from the ongoing business operations of related online-security firm iovation, which was spun out from UB-related activities in the middle of last decade.

In other words, they had millions of reasons to take a less-than-active role in denouncing the UB cheating as they should have years ago, millions of reasons not to step away from a company that was provably and obviously foul.

These latest statements, they’re just cheap shucks.

It’s pathetic to see Duke and Hellmuth supporters out there continuing to shill.  Statements such as, “Everyone got paid back,” and, “They were just paid to wear the gear,” are so stupid and lazy and self-deluding that the people making them really ought to just shut up.  The evidence of Hellmuth’s and Duke’s deeper responsibilities is widespread, obvious, and has existed for years.  Yet fans of anything are rarely known for their objective capabilities.

Phil Hellmuth and Annie Duke aren’t guilty of cheating or conspiracy in connection with what happened at UltimateBet.  But by the same measure, they’re not deserving of adulation, either.

. . . . .

Phil Hellmuth statement:

I’ve made a living off of reading people at the poker table and in the business world. Trusting my gut has allowed me to be at the top of my profession and develop a lifetime of friends and great experiences.

Unfortunately, I made a horrible read regarding my relationship with the founders of the now defunct online poker site Ultimate Bet.

I trusted their team and believed in their ability to run a first class website and business. Most importantly, I allowed them to convince me that they were honest and forthright. I’ve never been more wrong about anything in my life.

When I became aware of the cheating scandal, I immediately insisted that everyone be paid back and whoever was responsible be banished from the company. At the time, I was led to believe that if I left UB right away the business would be impacted and then less likely to pay it’s obligations to the victims. As such, I made the decision to believe the leaders of UB and stayed on in the hopes that they would make right to anyone cheated.

Listening to the recently released audio tapes of the UB founders has brought this situation back into the forefront of my thoughts. To hear them discussing this situation and actively deciding to keep me in the dark disgusts and infuriates me. They lied to me about their activities and I made a big mistake in trusting them for way too long.

I should have said something about this long ago, but until I heard the voices on the tapes myself I never really knew how wrong and misled I really was. I empathize deeply with the players who were taken advantage of through UB. Whether it is this or Black Friday, too many of my fellow poker players have lost confidence and their financial savings simply by playing the game they love. I hope that in the near future we have a strong, regulated online poker environment in the US so that we can all get back to playing the game we love. In the meantime, I want to pass along my support to everyone affected negatively through UB and my apologies for my initial support of people who didn’t deserve anyone’s trust in the first place.

. . . . .

Statement from Annie Duke:

Listening to the leaked audio that describes an elaborate attempt by some of UltimateBet.com’s founders, including Russ Hamilton and Greg Pierson, to cover up cheating reminds me once again how much I regret having been associated with the people that were involved in this conspiracy. The release of this audio has spurred accusations and I want to make it clear that I have never used a tool on a delay or otherwise that gave me or anyone else access to hole cards for use during real money play nor was I aware that such a tool existed until the scandal broke.

Knowing what I know today, I would have never encouraged anyone to play on the UltimateBet.com site under that management. I’m horrified at the lengths to which these people went to try to cover up their actions, and I am very sorry that I ever agreed to work with them. I remain very upset that people were cheated and that, partly because of the actions of the people on this tape, it took far too long to pay back the $23 million that was owed to the victims, and that hand history information was never fully provided to the public.

However, the audio recordings and the data dump from Travis Makar and others also make it completely clear who the perpetrators of the UltimateBet.com cheating were, and that I was not involved in their scheme in any way. For those who have not taken the time to listen to the full audio, at one point Russ Hamilton mischaracterizes my legitimate role as a commentator as he tries to concoct a cover story for his scheme. I can only assume that he is referring to the several times that I commentated on tournaments in which a delayed broadcast was provided to the public, as this was the only delay that I was ever aware of.

In the audio Dan Friedberg says, “I think for the public, it just has to be former consultant to the company, ah, took advantage of a server flaw by hacking into the client…” (This can be heard at 47:01 on the audio). Then Russ Hamilton adds, “And what you could also say is that the tool was originally set for a 15 minute delay and he [Makar] hacked it to a, uh, yeah, to a real time…” (47:29 on the audio). Then Russ continues, ‘Annie Duke used it on a 15 minute delay quite a few times.’ (47:41 on the audio). It is clear that they are trying to concoct a story to cover up what they did by suggesting that a third party hacked a legitimate delayed broadcast tool to create a cheating tool.

The facts are that during commentary, what I saw as the hands were being played wasexactly what every other spectator of the table was able to see. I and other co-commentators were providing commentary as we watched live play, and the broadcast of our comments was delayed as is standard practice to avoid affecting play. The screen that I saw was captured and streamed onto the internet along with my commentary so anyone who tuned into the broadcast saw exactly the same screen that I saw. The broadcast delay was designed to protect the integrity of the game by making sure that the hands my co-commentators and I were commenting on would be finished BEFORE our commentary was broadcast on the Internet. The existence of the delay was made public during the broadcasts. And we were never shown any non-public hole card information, during or after hands. Delayed commentary on tournaments was and still is standard practice for semi-live broadcasts of events, including the World Series of Poker Main Event.

At a separate point on the tape Dan Friedberg and Russ Hamilton discuss Houston Curtis’ account on UltimateBet.com. (This can be heard beginning at 59:55 on the audio). Dan says ‘we don’t want to come and ever mention that name [h_curtis], obviously’ and Russ adds (at 1:00:11):   ‘you can’t, ‘cause a lot of people know him, that’s his name, Hellmuth knows him, Annie knows him, and they know the name on the screen.’

Russ is saying they can’t include Houston’s name on any cheating accounts list provided to the public, because I know Houston. Russ knew that if I heard that cheating had been detected on that account that I would have immediately called Houston to ask him what had happened.  Russ also knew that Houston would have then told me that the only other person who had access to the login for this account was Russ himself and that would have opened Russ up to suspicion.  This highlights the fact that I was unaware of Russ’s involvement in the cheating and that they were actively trying to hide it from me.

These tapes make it clear that the perpetrators went to great lengths to lie, concoct multiple stories and conspire to cover-up their cheating. They tried to minimize their exposure in part by pawning off responsibility to Absolute Poker, the new owners. Absolute Poker did eventually, through an arduous audit process, working closely with the KGC, refund more than $23 million to players who were affected by the cheating. I stand by my decision at the time the scandal broke to try to work with Absolute to help facilitate that process.

Statement from Co-Commentator JohnVorhaus:

I worked alongside Annie Duke doing play-by-play and color commentary on UltimateBetonline poker tournaments during the mid-2000s. The use of a delay function during those broadcasts was for the express purpose of ensuring that our commentary didn’t inadvertently give information to the tournament players and had no connection whatsoever with the so-called ‘super-user scandal.’ Those who attempt to tar Annie with this brush are saying, essentially, ‘Person A used a hammer to build a treehouse, then Person B used a similar hammer to bludgeon a victim; therefore, Person A is guilty.’ The logic of this doesn’t hold up to the merest application of common sense.

Statement from Joanne Priam:

I am the former Pro Relations Manager for UB and was part of the team that helped organize the commentating of online tournaments. Annie agreed to participate as a commentator only if we could ensure that there was enough of a small delay in the broadcast so that we could avoid any live commentating affecting players’ behavior in the event they were listening. After it was confirmed the delay was feasible she agreed to commentate. It is my understanding that during the tournament, Annie was isolated in a recording studio with only a screen in which to report on and that she did not have access to a computer in which to log on to UB, view hole cards or interact in any way with players. I am disgusted by the actions of the criminals that cheated people out of millions of dollars, and wish they could be thrown in jail, but I can assure you that during the few times that Annie Duke was commentating it was impossible for her to do anything more than view a screen and commentate as requested.

 

 

 

Posted in NEWS, Op-ed | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Duke Denies Knowledge or Use of UltimateBet Cheating Tool

Annie Duke's Facebook StatementAs expected, former UltimateBet sponsored pro and spokesperson Annie Duke has issued a statement in response to suggestions on audio recordings made by Russ Hamilton that Duke had access to versions of the so-called “AuditMonster” program enabling users to view players’ hole cards. In her statement, Duke denies ever having had access to such a program, adding further that she had no knowledge that there was such a tool until after the scandal broke in early 2008.

The recordings were made public by Hamilton’s former assistant, Travis Makar, on May 10, and feature Hamilton, UltimateBet founder and iovation CEO Greg Pierson, and attorneys Daniel Friedberg and Sanford “Sandy” Millar openly discussing the method of cheating and formulating strategies for both covering up the scandal and minimizing the amount needed to refund to affected players.

The first three-hour recording was made early in 2008 following the initial findings by Two Plus Two posters regarding cheating suspicions and before Ultimate Bet issued an initial “interim statement” regarding the matter on March 7. The second two-hour recording was made in July, with references to Barry Greenstein’s Poker Road radio appearance (on 7/16/08) and the ongoing British Open (played 7/17-7/20) helping show that meeting likely took place on July 20.

On both recordings, Hamilton makes statements suggesting Duke had access to a version of the “AuditMonster” program he used to see opponents’ hole cards in real time and cheat them.

On the first recording, Hamilton states “Annie Duke used it on a 15-minute delay. Quite a few times.” No further explanation for the context of such use is offered, nor do others on the recording comment.

The second recording was made months later — that is, after the scandal had broken, after UltimateBet had issued an “interim statement” (March 2008) acknowledging the cheating, after an allegedly “third party” investigation inaccurately determined cheating only to have occurred from 2006-07 (May 2008), and after repayment plans to refund certain players had begun to be formulated (May 2008).

The second recording was also made after Duke herself had appeared in a video interview with John Caldwell of PokerNews (dated 6/26/08) to state multiple times that the matter had been “handled very gracefully… and with integrity” by UltimateBet “and they stepped up to the plate in a way much more than they really had to by any letter of the law.”

At that second meeting Hamilton again references Duke’s possession and use of the Auditmonster program, noting that she “even had a copy of it with a five-minute delay.” Friedberg responds to that statement by saying “right,” although his response sounds more likely to be simply a verbalized nodding in response to Hamilton and not a confirmation.

As noted here a week ago in a discussion of Hamilton’s comments regarding Duke, all of his statements must be considered with the knowledge that he alone was aware of the recording, with his credibility as an acceptable witness to any claims about Duke (or anyone or anything else) necessarily to be viewed with skepticism.

As reported last week, Duke initially responded to the release of the audio recordings with three short tweets acknowledging that she “had access to the delayed viewing of cards only for a few UB tournament events where [she] was a radio commentator,” attempting to contextualize those incidents within a suggestion that such was “standard practice” for such commentary.

However, Duke’s fuller statement (issued Saturday via her Facebook page) more explicitly distances herself from the Auditmonster program with which Hamilton and others cheated.

“I want to make it clear that I have never used a tool on a delay or otherwise that gave me or anyone else access to hole cards for use during real money play nor was I aware that such a tool existed until the scandal broke,” writes Duke. She goes on to clarify that when doing commentary for UB tournaments “what I saw as the hands were being played was exactly what every other spectator of the table was able to see,” with the broadcast of the commentary being shown on a delay.

As noted here last week, Duke’s description of the commentary more closely resembles that which has been done with other events, both live and online, with a delayed broadcast and no special knowledge of players’ hole cards. Both John Vorhaus, who participated as a co-commentator with Duke, and Joanne Priam, former Pro Relations Manager for UB, echo Duke’s description of the shows in statements appended to Duke’s.

While some continue to seize upon an apparent contradiction between Duke’s earlier suggestion that she “had access to the delayed viewing of cards” when commentating and her new statement denying ever having “access to hole cards,” it appears the confusion largely stemmed from the non-specificity of Duke’s initial tweeted response.

Duke only refers to the first reference by Hamilton (from the first recording), speculating that his doing so is part of the larger effort “to concoct a story to cover up what they did by suggesting that a third party hacked a legitimate delayed broadcast tool to create a cheating tool.”

Meanwhile, some have found reason to continue to dispute other points made in Duke’s new statement, including her expression of “once again” regretting her association with UB, which like Phil Hellmuth’s “I made a horrible read” statement from a week ago struck most as much different from earlier statements by Duke about the site and those associated with it.

Duke’s repeated references to the paying back of “the $23 million that was owed to the victims” in her statement has inspired critical response as well from those who understand the actual amount of stolen funds to have been much higher. Nor does Duke acknowledge the failure of Cereus to refund player funds following Black Friday, a total estimated by some to total approximately $55 million.

For more on the statements made by both Duke and Hellmuth, see Haley Hintze’s analysis, “The Annie Duke & Phil Hellmuth Statements: Technically True, Intellectually Dishonest.”

Posted in NEWS | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lock Poker CEO’s G911 Interview is Nothing but Spin (Part 2)

lock-poker-logoEarlier this week, Gambling911 editor Chris Costigan published a two-part “interview” with Lock Poker CEO Jennifer Larson in which Larson attempted to explain away the crisis of confidence that has engulfed the site. On Thursday, Flushdraw debunked Part 1 of the interview.

In Part 2, Costigan led with a question about the reasons behind the departures of Lock Pros Chris Moorman and Paul Volpe. Larson responded that the split with the two players was “just a timing issue and the spin doctors ran with it.”

That answer breezes right past the Twitter statements that each man made as part of the announcement that he’d left Lock (announcements which were unusual just for their very existence — poker players don’t usually announce when they end sponsorships.) Moorman and Volpe both acknowledged that Lock’s financial, communication and cashout struggles contributed to their decisions to leave.

“I sincerely hope Lock is able to overcome its current problems and for the sake of online poker their situation is resolved,” wrote Moorman.

“Hope poker becomes legal and they can resolve all the issues that there [sic] having,” said Volpe.

Costigan, unfortunately, did not put any follow-up question to Larson on this point, instead letting her “spin doctoring” comment cover the issue.

It must also be spin doctoring when players complain that they can’t get straight answers out of Lock despite multiple and repeated emails. Larson told Costigan that, “Over the last 10 months we have moved our average email response from 48 hours to 15 minutes.”

Larson’s statement isn’t independently verifiable, but player complaints on poker forums suggest that, at best, the 15-minute response claim is laughable. At the start of the recent cashout controversy which sparked the latest crisis at Lock, players who were told by Lock PR man Shane Bridges to “email security” reported emailing the Lock security team every day for a week without getting any response.

The one straightforward answer that Larson offered Costigan was that, “Lock has never done any banking in Cyprus, so the recent events there had no impact whatsoever on our operations.” She also spent a fair amount of time talking about how Lock “takes care of our players” with generous deposit bonuses and refusing to entirely prohibit P2P transfers.

Costigan again let her off the hook, however, by failing to follow up with pointed questions about Lock’s failure to cash players out in a timely fashion or for sums greater than $10,000. It’s hard to imagine how Lock can claim to “put our players first”, as Larson does, when those same players can’t cash out their winnings without considerable difficulties and when Lock communicates so poorly with them (when the site bothers to communicate with them at all).

Costigan’s final question weirdly attempted to throw dirt at Full Tilt and Pokerstars by pointing out that Full Tilt’s U.S. players still haven’t been paid out their account balances. Larson’s response set Larson up as some sort of martyr. She told Costigan, “because of my direct involvement and hands-on approach, people have somewhere to direct their irrational hatred.”

That comment misses the point entirely. The anger of Lock players has nothing to do with personal hatred of Jennifer Larson and everything to do with the frustration of players not being able to get their money off of Lock in a timely manner, unlike any other poker site in the market.

Larson took a swipe at the poker media as well. “It is clear that… ‘news’ sites are just focused on the fear they can incite,” she said. “Instead of respecting the industry that supports them, they are driving it into a fearful frenzy.”

“With the level of propaganda and media manipulation that has been mindlessly regurgitated, I decided to speak up.”

Larson seems to belabor under two misapprehensions: that the poker media is supported by the poker sites and thus owe some sort of editorial fealty to the sites, and that the community won’t fill informational vacuums. It is bad corporate PR strategy not to tackle issues directly and to, at least, control the message that gets put out. When companies fail to do that, their customers are left to envision the worst.

What’s more, it may have been true three years ago that the poker sites “supported” the poker media, but that has become less and less true since Black Friday changed the poker landscape. Independent sites have emerged. With that independence comes the ability to tell the poker community when the emperor isn’t wearing any clothes.

It’s not the poker media’s fault that Larson doesn’t want her company’s nakedness to be revealed to the world.

Posted in Op-ed | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

iPoker P2P Transfer Suspension Linked to Illicit American Player Ring?

The "full house" at iPoker likely had a few extra residents, if recent allegations are true.

The “full house” at iPoker likely had a few extra residents, if recent allegations are true.

Rumors of Americans playing online poker on international sites via VPN (Virtual Private Network) hookups have increased of late, and there’s new evidence that the iPoker Network’s recent suspension of P2P (player-to-player) transfer capabilities is directly tied to the illicit operation of a ring of anonymous American players participating on the site.

In the last 48 hours, FlushDraw has been investigating the claims made on the Poker Affiliate Listings site by an anonymous poster named “Vadimgust”.  The unknown poster, whose IP location PAL’s owners have yet to make public, launched accusations that the iPoker P2P suspension was due to the discovery of a ring of Americans playing via VPN, all under the control of the aggressive and controversial owner of the iPokerVIP.com affiliate site, Jamie Nevin.

A sample of those claims:

A few days ago Ipoker blocked all p2p transfers which let many people who are honestly staking players hanging …. Reason of this closure is pokervip.com aka Jamie Nevin who hid themselves behind staking business to send US players to various rooms on the Ipoker Network …. especially Winner Poker, William Hill, Paddy Poker and Boylespoker …. The US players were registered on the rooms with different addresses and used a VPN, then pokervip.com transferred money to them per p2p transfer …. once a player wanted to cashout they transferred back to pokervip.com and got the money transferred in a way US players can accept such as Paypal, bank transfer …. This ofc is simply money laundering on a big scale ….

It’s actually ipokervip.com, not pokervip.com, to clarify; that little detail was slightly off.  As for Nevin, he’s been a lightning rod for controversy ever since his arrival on the affiliate scene three or four years back.  Reportedly in his early 20′s, Nevin has been widely and previously accused by other affiliates of unethical, predatory and cutthroat tactics, and as a result is largely held in disfavor by other affiliates throughout the poker world.

The allegations themselves are serious.  The alleged creation of a VPN-centered network allowing Americans to play on networks not currently serving the US is, of course, a flagrant violation of those networks’ terms of service, and if left unchecked after discovery, could endanger the future plans of any such network to enter a fully-regulated US market.

While such things are known to have occurred — a frequent Reddit poster named has even posted a general how-to on the topic, complete with YouTube videos — the concept of an affiliate operator organizing such an illicit ring, including fake identification for its participants, is a possibility which should give any online poker network concern.

Despite the whiffs of a bit of real flame beneath the smoky accusations, the nature of the initial PAL allegation was enough to withhold publication on a news forum.  Nevin’s unpopularity could have made him a target of unfounded rumors, and the trustwothiness of an anonymous poster making a first post under an unknown screen name on any site would always be suspect.

Nonetheless, inquiries behind the scenes confirmed that the rumors did have legs, and were more widespread than a single forum posting would indicate.  Today, over at pokerfuse, came the news that Nevin’s site had been officially tied to iPoker Network’s P2P suspension.

An e-mailing from iPoker to its member skins, reported on by fuse co-editor Nick Jones, announces that all these room will be required to submit KYC (“Know Your Customer”) verifications on all players referred by iPokerVIP.  The intent appears to be to root out all the United States-based players participating on iPoker via VPN hookups controlled by Nevin.

The initial allegations by the PAL poster (above) mentioned Winner Poker, William Hill, Paddy Poker and Boylespoker, and asserted that other rooms may be involved as well.  Of those, Winner Poker itself had a large number of player accounts recently suspended, though the initial crackdown may have overreached, as at least a few of those Winner accounts have been reopened.

Such a crackdown against US-based players probably could have been foreseen, given both the capabilities of VPN hookups and the risks such play could present to international sites.  IPoker is part of a heated traffic battle for the global #2 spot in online poker traffic, battling both PartyPoker and Full Tilt, each of whom is still well behind leader PokerStars.

Many significant rooms could be impacted, as this image of iPoker member skins shows:

ScreenHunter_05 May. 16 16.14

Posted in NEWS | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Impending Launch of Real Money Online Site Highlights WSOP Conference Call

Players will descend upon the Rio All-Suite Hotel and Casino in less than two weeks for the 2013 WSOP

Players will descend upon the Rio All-Suite Hotel and Casino in less than two weeks for the 2013 WSOP

With the 2013 World Series of Poker less than two weeks away, the WSOP yesterday conducted its annual conference call to discuss the upcoming Series and invite media questions. While much of the hour was spent reviewing information that had previously been made available, a few new items were discussed, the most notable being Caesars’ hope to launch its own real money online poker site in the near future, perhaps during the WSOP.

Present on the call were WSOP Executive Director Ty Stewart, WSOP Tournament Director Jack Effel, and WSOP Communications Director Seth Palansky, with those three taking the first 20 minutes to speak in general terms about planning and preparation while voicing the usual optimism about the Series. Items discussed by those three included the following:

      • the strategic scheduling of low buy-in events early in the Series encourages expectations for high turnouts early at this year’s WSOP, as does the fact that more rooms have been booked at the Rio All-Suite Hotel and Casino than in past years
      • the WSOP Player of the Year (which includes the WSOP APAC and WSOPE and is currently led by Daniel Negreanu) will win entries into the subequent WSOPE and WSOP APAC Main Events as well as the 2014 WSOP ME
      • in addition to the full schedule of “Daily Deepstack” events, the WSOP will revive its “Carnivale of Poker” series (last staged from 1998-2000), with additional low buy-in “medallion events” every Monday and Tuesday throughout the WSOP, then every day during the Main Event; most of the 21 Carnivale events will be no-limit hold’em, with a few mixed-game events and the $5K open-face Chinese event also included
      • the top 10 point-getters in Carnivale of Poker events will split $100,000
      • following the WSOP’s conclusion there will be 40 hours of original coverage on ESPN, starting with the WSOP APAC Main Event final table and the WSOP National Championship, then focusing on the WSOP Main Event through November with the final table again to be broadcast in its entirety
      • there is a hope that at least 100 players will participate in the $111,111 buy-in “One Drop High Rollers” NLHE event (Event No. 47)
      • there is also hope that the new WSOP-branded real money online poker site will “go live at some point during the WSOP,” with players being able to sign up for accounts either online or at the Rio

Few details were offered regarding the timeline or offerings for the new WSOP real money online poker site, although twice during the call shots were fired in the general direction of Nevada-based Ultimate Poker, the first and so far only real money site in operation in the U.S.

“I think the market is ready for a first-class product,” said Stewart, a subtle reference to Ultimate Poker’s humble software and offerings as well as the various troubles UP has experienced during its first two weeks of operation. Later during the Q&A, a question about the new WSOP.com site prompted Stewart to chime in again to suggest jokingly to Palansky to “make sure that there’s only one nine of spades in the deck,” a dig at an apparent software glitch that caused a UP player recently to see two identical cards on a flop during a hand played.

References to other scandals and hardships experienced by poker players during recent years also led Stewart to suggest a felt obligation by the WSOP especially to avoid such difficulties and provide players a problem-free experience. “We at the WSOP feel the responsibility to be poker’s spring in the heat of the summer,” said Stewart.

The remainder of the hour was taken up with the Q&A period, with 15 different reporters asking questions. Items discussed during the Q&A included the following:

      • security at the WSOP should be the same as in previous years (i.e., backpacks, bags, purses will be allowed), although Palansky did add “Will we do random searches? We might.”
      • a few re-entry events have been added to the schedule to provide variety; according to Stewart “the Main Event will never be a re-entry”
      • there will likely be some recognition — probably at the Main Event — of the 10th anniversary of Chris Moneymaker’s 2003 ME win
      • there will be online streaming of final tables of 33 bracelet events this summer (on a half-hour delay) that will employ RFID technology to show hole cards of players involved in hands
      • a question about efforts to increase participation of women at the WSOP was met with references to the changed buy-in policy for this year’s Ladies event ($1,000 for women, $10,000 for men) and Stewart discussing a new XBox game, “WSOP Full House Pro,” to be launched later in the summer (ostensibly presented as a possible mode of introducing women to poker and eventually to the WSOP)
      • wagering on final tables at the Rio Race and Sports Book will not return this year, except for the Main Event
      • repeated questions about launch dates for the real money online poker were deflected, with Palansky pointing out how the timeline was not completely within Caesars’ control

As mentioned, the news of Caesars’ planned-for real money online poker site represented a primary take-away from the call, despite the lack of details provided. Caesars Interactive Entertainment received its license approval from the Nevada Gaming Control Board in December 2012, and its new site will employ 888′s software, with the latter group receiving its NV license in March 2013.

Many are interested to see both how the site will look and function as well as whether or not the site’s launch will in fact come during the WSOP, a goal if which met will be of obvious benefit to Caesars.

Posted in NEWS, POKER TOURNAMENTS | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lock Poker CEO’s G911 Interview is Nothing but Spin

lock-poker-logoWhile the poker world’s attention was consumed by the secret UB recordings that were released last weekend, Lock Poker CEO Jennifer Larson gave an interview to Gambling911’s editor, Chris Costigan. Although Costigan billed it as a sit-down interview, the use of scare quotes in several of Larson’s answers suggests that she responded in writing to a list of questions provided to her in advance by Costigan.

G911 is not exactly an impartial observer when it comes to Lock. The site is a major affiliate of Lock. Its employees regularly attend Lock company retreats on the poker site’s dime. The fact that Larson would only speak to G911 and not to any other poker media site speaks volumes about Lock’s willingness to answer tough questions from the community.

Costigan did not ask any tough questions.

Lock’s massive delays in processing cashout requests have raised a number of concerns among players, chief among them that Lock is broke. The players have repeatedly requested that the company submit to a public, independent audit of its books (a task that Lock’s licensor, Curacao, theoretically conducts privately) so that the players can be reassured that Lock has all player funds on hand. Costigan asked why this hasn’t happened.

Larson said that such an audit is impossible because auditors “are unable to state that if pressured by the US Government they will not disclose the details of the Lock accounts they audit … and admit that the threat of being ‘black listed’ by the DOJ … cannot justify their taking Lock on as a client. No other online gaming site has or can publicly open its ‘books’.”

There are plenty of audit firms in the world that don’t do business in the U.S. and over whom the DOJ holds absolutely no power. Regardless, the DOJ isn’t in the habit of blacklisting anybody, especially companies that aren’t breaking any laws. It’s not illegal to audit a company just because that company may be violating the law in the course of its operations.

Frankly, if the DOJ wants to subpoena a company to learn about Lock’s bank accounts, it can start with the payment processors that Lock uses and can go from there.

It’s easy for Lock to claim that no other gaming company has publicly opened its books. That claim conveniently ignores two critical facts: (1) those other companies haven’t had the payment processing problems that Lock has had; and (2) those companies are licensed in jurisdictions that transparently require player funds to be segregated from operational funds, ensuring that the funds will always be available for cashout even if the company goes bankrupt.

Regarding the uproar over P2P transfers that started the latest Lock crisis, Larson repeated Lock’s claim that people were abusing P2P transfers “to move and withdraw funds without any play taking place” and the policy was changed “to put an end to money laundering”. Larson also claimed that the “money laundering ring caused a massive increase in withdrawals causing legitimate player’s cashouts to be delayed.”

In the abstract, yes, P2P transfers can be used to launder money. What criminal, however, would use Lock Poker to launder money when cashouts take weeks or months to receive and are capped at $10,000?

The reality of what was happening was that players, frustrated by lengthy delays in receiving Lock cashouts, were selling their funds at a discount on a secondary market. The buyers were people who had access to faster Lock cashout methods (through affiliate accounts or otherwise) that allowed them to jump the queue of pending cashouts.

In the aggregate, this arbitrage should have sped up Lock’s cashout process, not slow it down. It reduced the number of pending cashouts – people who sell on a secondary market are people who would otherwise cash out if the secondary market didn’t exist – by reducing the number of pending cashouts and saving Lock some transaction fees. The total of the amount that players want to cash out, in the aggregate, is unchanged. It simply is happening in fewer cashout transactions, which should be a win for players and Lock alike.

Part 1 of the interview concluded with some discussion of the Revolution Network that was completely unrelated and irrelevant to any of the concerns that Lock’s players have raised over the last few weeks and months. We’ll dig into Part 2 of the interview tomorrow.

Posted in Op-ed | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment